Talking Data Equity with Heather Krause

Talking Data Equity with Mickey McGlasson from CREATE Labs

One of the questions we followed up with was about privacy and the Gigacam. Here’s Mickey’s reply: The Gigapan privacy thing is a reasonable question that we wrestle with. The Gigapan website, gigapan.com, has some formal consent language, if you think that’s helpful, but my general response is that we try to preserve a reasonable expectation of privacy in any image that we use ourselves for educational purposes β€” i.e., like with Obama’s inauguration we would ask students to look at specific public figures on the platform but not, for instance, try to identify anonymous members of the public in the crowd. But it is a fair concern, and we would never try to draw attention to people in private or unexpected settings.

Talking Data Equity with Dr. Kamden Strunk

slides!

Against a Critical Quantitative Orthodoxy.pdf (198.1 KB)

Talking Data Equity: From Loss to Legacy (Part 2). The story of saving the USAID Education Data and What Comes Next.

Resource links:

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/IN12502

https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/common-rule/index.html

Talking Data Equity with Isabel Algrant & Amy Hawn Nelson from AISP

Slides with links to resources

Talking Data Equity Toolkit 2.6.2026.pdf (5.2 MB)

As promised, here is the list of readings that Dr. Strunk includes with his course:

Foundations / Sociohistorical Context

Gottesman, I. (2016). Revolutionary moments. In The critical turn in education (pp. 9–30).

Gottesman, I. (2016). Political economy and the academic left. In The critical turn in education (pp. 31–51).

Collins, D. R., & Cannella, G. S. (2021). Racisms in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 27(10), 1139–1145.

Donmoyer, R. (2024). The paradigm wars reconsidered. In Young & Diem (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 39–55).

Strunk, K. K. (2024). Critical approaches to quantitative research. In Young & Diem (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 56–74).

De/Colonizing Approaches

Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.

Pillow, W. S. (2019). Epistemic witnessing. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 32(2), 118–135.

Leonardo, Z., Singh, M. V., & Delgado Noguera, Z. (2024). Education and colonialism. In Young & Diem (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 103–121).

Cutler, K. D., & Liou, D. D. (2024). Decoloniality content analysis. In Young & Diem (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 715–734).

Indigenous Methodologies

Beck, N. (2018). Troubling the translating. In Winkle-Wagner et al. (Eds.), Critical theory and qualitative data analysis in education (pp. 46–51).

Walter, M., & Andersen, C. (2013). The paradigm of Indigenous methodologies. In Indigenous statistics (pp. 58–81).

Walter, M., & Andersen, C. (2013). Naryi kati (β€œgood numbers”). In Indigenous statistics (pp. 82–110).

McKinley, B., Brayboy, J., & Chin, J. (2018). Tribal critical race theory. In DeCuir-Gunby et al. (Eds.), Understanding critical race research methods (pp. 51–63).

Critical Theory

Gottesman, I. (2016). Ideology and hegemony. In The critical turn in education (pp. 52–73).

Gottesman, I. (2016). Critical pedagogy. In The critical turn in education (pp. 74–93).

Strunk, K. K., & Betties, J. S. (2019). Using critical theory in educational research. In Strunk & Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity (pp. 71–80).

Duncan-Andrade, J. M., & Morrell, E. (2008). Youth participatory action research. In The art of critical pedagogy (pp. 105–131).

Critical Race Theory & QuantCrit

Gottesman, I. (2016). Critical theories of race. In The critical turn in education (pp. 116–137).

Sung, K. K., & Coleman, N. (2019). Framing CRT methodologies. In Strunk & Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity (pp. 45–58).

Dixson, A. D., James, A., & Frieson, B. L. (2018). Taking it to the streets. In DeCuir-Gunby et al. (Eds.), Understanding critical race research methods (pp. 64–75).

Stovall, D. (2018). Jazz methodology and CRT. In DeCuir-Gunby et al. (Eds.), Understanding critical race research methods (pp. 76–85).

Winkle-Wagner, J., SulΓ©, V. T., & Maramba, D. C. (2018). CRT policy analysis. In Critical theory and qualitative data analysis in education (pp. 193–204).

DeCuir-Gunby, J. T. (2020). Critical race mixed methodology. Educational Psychologist, 55(4), 244–255.

Teranishi, R. T. (2007). Critical quantitative research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 133, 37–49.

Garcia, N. M., Velez, V. N., & Huber, P. L. (2022). Critical race feminista quantitative praxis. Equity & Excellence in Education, 56(1–2), 190–205.

Castillo, W., & Gillborn, S. (2025). Leveraging QuantCrit. Educational Psychologist, 60(4), 301–316.

Velez, V. N., & Garcia, N. M. (2024). QuantCrit spatial research. In Young & Diem (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 695–714).

Feminist Approaches

Gottesman, I. (2016). Feminist standpoint epistemology. In The critical turn in education (pp. 94–115).

Lather, P. (2008). (Post)feminist methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 1(1), 55–64.

St. Pierre, E. A. (2000). Poststructural feminism. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(5), 477–515.

Toliver, S. R. (2022). Womanist discourse analysis. Equity & Excellence in Education, 56(1–2), 206–220.

Queer Theory & Methodologies

Butler, J. (1993). Critically queer. GLQ, 1, 17–32.

Blockett, R. A. (2018). Queer of Color critique. In Critical theory and qualitative data analysis in education (pp. 109–123).

Nicolazzo, Z. (2017). Trans* epistemology. Urban Education, 56(3), 511–536.

Mayo, C., & Rodriguez, N. M. (2019). Queer pedagogies. In Queer pedagogies (pp. 1–8).

Strunk, K. K. (2024). QuantQueer. Educational Studies, 60(1), 5–18.

Shannon-Baker, P. (2021). Queering mixed methods research. In Encyclopedia of queer studies in education.

Cisneros, J. (2018). Undocuqueer meaning making. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(11), 1415–1434.

Shelton, S. A., & Lester, A. O. (2018). Trans youth narratives. Sex Education, 18(4), 391–405.

Dis/Ability Studies

Erevelles, N. (2019). Disability and intersectionality. Educational Studies, 55(6), 592–605.

Loutzenheiser, L. W., & Erevelles, N. (2019). Crippin’ educational studies. Educational Studies, 55(4), 375–386.

Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). DisCrit. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31.

Annamma, S. A. (2017). Education journey mapping. Qualitative Inquiry, 24(1), 20–34.

Parekh, G. (2024). Critical disability quantitative inquiry. In Young & Diem (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 414–429).

Participatory & Engaged Methods

Caraballo, L. et al. (2017). YPAR and critical epistemologies. Review of Research in Education, 41, 311–336.

Desai, S. R. (2019). YPAR in practice. In Strunk & Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity (pp. 124–136).

Walls, J., & Holquist, S. E. (2019). Photo-elicitation methods. In Strunk & Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity (pp. 151–162).

Andrzejewski, C. E., Arnberg, B., & Baggett, H. C. (2019). Transformative mixed methods. In Strunk & Locke (Eds.), Research methods for social justice and equity (pp. 241–253).

Heinecke, W. et al. (2024). Community-engaged research. In Young & Diem (Eds.), Handbook of critical education research (pp. 334–355).

Critical Policy & Organizational Analysis

Allan, E. J. (2010). Feminist poststructural policy analysis. In Reconstructing policy in higher education (pp. 11–35).

McCambly, H., & Mulroy, Q. (2024). Racialized quality politics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 46(2), 192–221.

Ray, V. (2019). Racialized organizations. American Sociological Review, 84(1), 26–53.

McCoy-Simmons, C., Orphan, C. M., & GΓ‘ndara, D. (2023). Policy intermediaries and racism. Educational Policy, 37(6), 1672–1699.