Thanks 
I mean, I think it all comes down to the fact that we are people with worldviews interacting with plants. Maybe a good specific example is this map of spring arrival we run (Status of Spring | USA National Phenology Network) - it’s based on leaf out and bloom in lilacs and honeysuckles - but that’s just one definition of what spring is - what would it look like if we had engaged people from diverse cultures (and broader geographies) in defining spring and developing the map/index from there? I also think about the volunteers collecting data vs the academic researchers typically using it - we do have cases where volunteers ask the questions, but I think the norm is more data flowing to academia and then pubs coming out (that benefit researchers, and don’t necessarily get at the questions volunteers have). And we’ve engaged with Indigenous communities - which has taken us away from data and into relationship/responsibility, but there’s a lot to say there too… should we be serving data about tribal lands (eg satellite derived greenness) without conversation, relationship? Could talk about this all day!
5 Likes